buena park measure r No Further a Mystery
buena park measure r No Further a Mystery
Blog Article
When asked by Councilmember Connor Traut whether or not the town could pay for to hire extra law enforcement with its existing revenue, town supervisor Aaron France said “no.” He included that improved parks and roads are unachievable with The existing revenue.
Even so, BBB does not validate the accuracy of knowledge provided by 3rd events, and isn't going to promise the precision of any info in Enterprise Profiles.
All details these cookies collect is aggregated and for that reason nameless. If you don't allow these cookies we will not likely know when you have visited our internet site, and will not be capable to watch its general performance.
A “no” vote opposed developing phrase boundaries of 3 four-calendar year phrases for town council customers along with the mayor.
A "no" vote opposed authorizing the City Council to adopt publicly-reviewed land use ideas to "revitalize" specific regions of town, increase affordable housing, and limit making heights.
It is possible to see no matter if Ballotpedia is masking this county's regional ballot measures determined by the listing of counties overlapping with the most important cities, which is available in this article.
permit to the mayor or even a the greater part of town council to terminate a council Assembly, given that not less than a single is still held through the month;
A “no” vote opposed this measure authorizing the city to impose a gross receipts tax of up to six% on marijuana businesses and grant around 4 cannabis delivery licenses.
A “yes” vote supported authorizing the town to impose a gross buena park measure r receipts tax of as many as 6% on marijuana firms and grant approximately four cannabis shipping and delivery licenses, therefore increasing town's common fund earnings by an believed level of among $one million and $2 million each year.
A "Of course" vote supported the institution of the new specifications for resort zoning and lodge progress in Laguna Beach, as well as the prerequisite of voter acceptance for hotel progress initiatives that don't conform to the requirements.
A “no” vote opposed placing city council members' salaries by use from the California Authorities Code's salary system, commencing at $600 every month.
A "no" vote opposed amending the Constitution to include phrase boundaries, altered finances needs, plus a adjust of language throughout the Constitution.
A "no" vote opposed enacting a tax on cannabis corporations to fund general municipal services right up until it really is repealed by voters.
“But each penny in new revenues would be invested on companies that gain inhabitants, like road fix, well-preserved parks and superior community protection,” the report claimed.